On this page
- The short answer
- AI voice is an artificial voice
- Written consent (PEWC)
- Is calling a seller telemarketing?
- What changes Nov 25, 2026
- Do-Not-Call and human calls
- Calling hours by state
- The Connecticut rule
- Recording and AI disclosure
- Inbound calls and callbacks
- California: AB 1850 and AB 851
- What a lawful setup looks like
- Questions
- Sources
The short answer
AI voice is an artificial voice
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act bars calls “using any automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice” to a cell phone without the called party's prior express consent, and sets the same rule for home lines (47 U.S.C. 227(b)(1)). In February 2024 the FCC settled whether AI voices count:
“the TCPA's restrictions on the use of ‘artificial or prerecorded voice’ encompass current AI technologies”
The ruling adds that there is no carve-out for tools that “purport to provide the equivalent of a live agent” (para. 6). If synthetic speech reaches the person you called, the call needs consent. An AI that only whispers suggestions to a human caller is different: the person on the other end hears a human.
Damages are private and per call: $500, trebled to $1,500 if willful (227(b)(3)). A ringless voicemail is also a call (FCC 22-85), so AI voicemail drops follow the same rule.
Prior express written consent (PEWC)
For telemarketing with an artificial voice, consent must be written (47 CFR 64.1200(a)(2)-(3)). The definition in 64.1200(f)(9) asks for an agreement, signed (an e-signature counts), that:
- names the seller (your business) and clearly authorizes calls using an autodialer or an artificial or prerecorded voice;
- shows the phone number the person authorizes;
- discloses clearly and conspicuously that signing is not a condition of buying anything, and the form must really submit without it.
A website checkbox plus a submit button can be the signature (FCC 12-21 para. 34), and the caller carries the burden of proving it (para. 33). Pre-checked boxes, consent buried in terms of service, and “we and our partners may call you” all fail. Leads bought from a lead seller don't carry consent to your business either.
The FCC's 2023 “one-to-one consent” rule was vacated by the Eleventh Circuit in January 2025 and never took effect, but the FTC's Telemarketing Sales Rule still requires consent to a “specific seller” (16 CFR 310.4(b)(1)(v)), so name one business.
Is a call to a homeowner telemarketing?
“Telemarketing” means a call “for the purpose of encouraging the purchase or rental of, or investment in, property, goods, or services” (64.1200(f)(13)). An agent asking for a listing is selling brokerage services. Pure “we buy houses” offers have split the courts: some district courts held they are not solicitations (as reported in secondary sources).
The Ninth Circuit, which covers California, Arizona and Washington, went the other way in June 2026. In Coffey v. Fast Easy Offer it held that home-buying messages can be telephone solicitations when one purpose of the outreach is selling brokerage services. And even a call that is not telemarketing still needs prior express consent if an AI voice reaches a cell phone. The safe reading: treat every seller call as telemarketing.
What changes on November 25, 2026
FCC 26-67, published October 26, 2026, takes effect November 25, 2026:
- Callers may name one exclusive way to opt out (a keypress, a reply word, or a website or number), if they disclose it clearly on the call or text. Callers that don't must keep honoring any reasonable request.
- An opt-out from a telemarketing call or text revokes consent to all of that caller's telemarketing calls and texts, not just the one campaign.
- Opt-outs must still be honored within 10 business days. A separate FCC notice proposes shortening that (comments due November 25, 2026).
Several state laws require you to stop calling the moment someone asks on the call, so many callers will keep accepting every channel. Parcel does: “stop calling”, pressing 9, an email reply or the web page all take effect immediately.
Do-Not-Call and human calls
A person dialing a cold lead is not an artificial voice, but the National Do-Not-Call rules still apply to telephone solicitations of home and cell numbers (64.1200(c)(2), (e)). The safe harbor needs written procedures, training, an internal do-not-call list and a scrub against registry data no more than 31 days old.
- Registry access for fiscal 2027 (from October 1, 2026) costs $85 per area code after the first five free, up to $23,425 (FTC).
- Every seller needs its own subscription: sharing the cost of registry access among clients is prohibited (16 CFR 310.8(c)).
- Do-not-call requests to your business are recorded when made, honored within 10 business days and kept for 5 years, and can't be passed to other companies without the person's permission (64.1200(d)).
- Avoid automated dialers on cold leads: Florida, Oklahoma and Maryland regulate automated selection or dialing too. One click per call keeps a person in charge.
Calling hours by state
Federal law allows telephone solicitations from 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. in the called person's local time (64.1200(c)(1)). Several states are stricter, and a number can belong to a different time zone than the property:
A window that satisfies every row: Monday to Saturday, 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. local time, no Sundays or federal holidays (plus Louisiana state holidays), checked in every time zone the area code, mailing address and property could be in, and at most three attempts in 24 hours. That is Parcel's default for AI calls, and the last call starts by 7:50 p.m.
The Connecticut rule
Connecticut goes further than any other state we read: “No telemarketer may make, or cause to be made, a telephonic sales call to a consumer without such consumer's prior express written consent” (C.G.S. 42-288a(l)). That covers a live person too. It applies to Connecticut residents and to Connecticut area codes (203, 475, 860 and 959), excludes calls made in response to the consumer's own request or inquiry, and carries penalties up to $20,000 per violation. The written consent must list the means you will use to call.
Recording and AI disclosure
AI calls are recorded or transcribed, so recording law applies. California requires the consent of all parties to record a cell-phone call (Penal Code 632.7; 632 for confidential calls), with $5,000 per violation in civil damages. Washington wants the announcement itself recorded (RCW 9.73.030); Connecticut (52-570d) and Florida (934.03) also need everyone's consent. Announce the recording at the start of every call, inbound and outbound.
Say it's an AI, at the start and whenever asked:
- Utah requires regulated occupations, real estate licensees included, to disclose AI verbally at the start of a high-risk interaction (SB 226).
- California requires a live voice to say when a prerecorded message uses an artificial voice, for automated dialing-announcing devices not covered by an exemption (PUC 2874).
- The FCC has proposed requiring an AI disclosure at the start of every AI-generated call and AI-specific wording in consent forms (FCC 24-84); it was still pending on October 30, 2026.
Inbound calls and callbacks
The FCC has said the TCPA's robocall rules “do not extend to technologies used to answer inbound calls” (FCC 24-84, para. 3), and the Telemarketing Sales Rule exempts calls the customer starts. So an AI receptionist that answers sellers who call you is the easy case: disclose the AI and the recording, and don't pry.
Calling that seller back is different. A person may call back anyone who asked. An AI callback is an artificial-voice telemarketing call, and a caller ID captured without notice is not consent. So before scheduling an AI callback, the AI reads a consent script word for word (naming your business, the number, AI and automated calls, and that agreeing isn't required) and needs a clear “yes”. A voice recording is a valid e-signature (FCC 12-21 para. 34). Without that yes, a person calls back.
California: AB 1850 and AB 851
AB 1850 (wholesaler licensing) is not law
AB 1850 would have required a license to wholesale and written disclosure that the wholesaler won't take title. Its last action was “In committee: Held under submission” on May 14, 2026 (bill history), so it died for the 2025-26 session. California's existing broker licensing law still applies, and whether marketing a contract you don't own needs a license is a question for a lawyer.
AB 851 bans unsolicited offers in 15 fire-area ZIP codes until 2027
Civil Code 2079.26 bars unsolicited offers to buy residential property, by phone, text, email or mail, in 90049, 90263, 90265, 90272, 90290, 90402, 91001, 91024, 91103, 91104, 91106, 91107, 91301, 91302 and 91320, with penalties up to $25,000 per violation, until January 1, 2027 (AB 851).
What a lawful setup looks like
This is how Parcel's AI Caller is built. It is one way to do it, not the only one:
- 01
Reach cold owners without an AI voice
Email from your own mailbox (CAN-SPAM footer and unsubscribe), mail, or a person dialing one number at a time after a DNC scrub. - 02
Ask for consent on your own seller page
An unchecked checkbox that names your registered business, the number, AI and automated calls and texts, and says agreeing isn't required. The form submits without it. The exact words, time, page and IP are stored in a hash-chained ledger. - 03
Answer every inbound call
The AI says it is an AI assistant and that the call is recorded, asks the questions, books the appointment, or transfers to you. - 04
Call back only the people who said yes
Within minutes, inside Monday-to-Saturday 9-to-8 local hours, at most three attempts a day, never Connecticut numbers without written consent or a callback they asked for within the last 90 days. Imported, Deal Radar and skip-traced numbers can never be AI-called; there is no override. - 05
Stop on any opt-out, everywhere, at once
"Stop calling", pressing 9, an email reply or the opt-out page adds the number to your do-not-call list immediately and revokes consent.
AI Caller is $99 a month on its own or part of Acquisition ($189). It is in early access: the phone line goes live once Parcel connects its voice provider. See how it works.
Questions
Sources
- 1.FCC 24-17, Declaratory Ruling on AI voices (Feb 8, 2024) · Federal Communications Commission · read October 30, 2026
- 2.47 U.S.C. 227 (Telephone Consumer Protection Act) · Cornell LII · read October 30, 2026
- 3.47 CFR 64.1200, Delivery restrictions · eCFR · read October 30, 2026
- 4.FCC 12-21, written consent and E-SIGN (2012) · Federal Communications Commission · read October 30, 2026
- 5.FCC 22-85, ringless voicemail is a call (Nov 21, 2022) · Federal Communications Commission · read October 30, 2026
- 6.16 CFR 310, Telemarketing Sales Rule · eCFR · read October 30, 2026
- 7.Coffey v. Fast Easy Offer, No. 25-4066 (9th Cir. June 4, 2026) · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · read October 30, 2026
- 8.FCC 26-67 Report and Order, 91 FR 67214 (Oct 26, 2026) · Federal Register · read October 30, 2026
- 9.FCC further notice on revocation deadlines (Oct 26, 2026) · Federal Register · read October 30, 2026
- 10.FCC 24-84 proposed rules on AI-generated calls, 89 FR 73321 · Federal Register · read October 30, 2026
- 11.FTC: FY2027 fees for the National Do Not Call Registry · Federal Trade Commission · read October 30, 2026
- 12.Florida Statutes 501.059 · Florida Legislature · read October 30, 2026
- 13.Florida Statutes 501.616 · Florida Legislature · read October 30, 2026
- 14.Oklahoma Telephone Solicitation Act (HB 3168) · Oklahoma Legislature · read October 30, 2026
- 15.Maryland Commercial Law 14-4502 · Maryland General Assembly · read October 30, 2026
- 16.Connecticut General Statutes chapter 743m (telemarketing) · Connecticut General Assembly · read October 30, 2026
- 17.RCW 80.36.390 (telephone solicitation) · Washington Legislature · read October 30, 2026
- 18.RCW 80.36.400 (automatic dialing and announcing devices) · Washington Legislature · read October 30, 2026
- 19.Texas Business and Commerce Code 301.051 · Texas statutes · read October 30, 2026
- 20.Louisiana R.S. 45:811 · Louisiana Legislature · read October 30, 2026
- 21.Massachusetts General Laws c.159C §3 · Massachusetts Legislature · read October 30, 2026
- 22.New York General Business Law 399-z · New York State Senate · read October 30, 2026
- 23.Virginia Code 59.1-511 · Virginia Law · read October 30, 2026
- 24.California Penal Code 632 · California Legislative Information · read October 30, 2026
- 25.California Penal Code 632.7 · California Legislative Information · read October 30, 2026
- 26.RCW 9.73.030 (recording) · Washington Legislature · read October 30, 2026
- 27.Connecticut General Statutes 52-570d (recording) · Connecticut General Assembly · read October 30, 2026
- 28.Florida Statutes 934.03 (recording) · Florida Legislature · read October 30, 2026
- 29.Utah SB 226 (2025), AI disclosure · Utah Legislature · read October 30, 2026
- 30.California Public Utilities Code 2874 (AB 2905) · California Legislative Information · read October 30, 2026
- 31.California AB 1850 (2025-26) bill history · California Legislative Information · read October 30, 2026
- 32.California AB 851, Civil Code 2079.26 · CalMatters Digital Democracy · read October 30, 2026
Changes
- : First published. Reviewed against the primary sources that day; attorney review pending.